Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Execution Petition No. 408 of 2015

Case between Thirunnavaya Service Co- Operative Bank Ltd. vs Premraj Devid and Another regarding execution under Order 21 Rule 64,66

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2016-12-17
Duration
1 year

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Execution petition filed by a bank against the respondents under Order 21 Rule 64,66 of the Civil Procedure Code was dismissed for default as the petitioner did not appear despite multiple chances.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the Execution Petition for default as the petitioner did not appear despite repeated chances for enquiry.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of the Execution Petition
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Petitioner not present. Even after giving repeated chances for enquiry the petitioner has not entitled and not present. Hence the EP is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Thirunnavaya Service Co- Operative Bank Ltd. (Age not specified years) Thirunnavaya amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Premraj Devid (Age not specified years) Sams House, Kodakkal Post, Thirunnavaya amsom, Karathur desom, Tirur Taluk Another (Age not specified years) Not mentioned

Reliefs

Relief Type: Execution Petition Dismissal
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Dismissal of the Execution Petition for default
Evidence:
Petitioner not present. Even after giving repeated chances for enquiry the petitioner has not entitled and not present. Hence the EP is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Thu, 12/17/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases