Case Summary
Execution petition filed by a bank against the respondents under Order 21 Rule 64,66 of the Civil Procedure Code was dismissed for default as the petitioner did not appear despite multiple chances.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of the Execution Petition
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the Execution Petition for default as the petitioner did not appear despite repeated chances for enquiry.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petitioner not present. Even after giving repeated chances for enquiry the petitioner has not entitled and not present. Hence the EP is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thirunnavaya Service Co- Operative Bank Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by its secretary
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Premraj Devid
- Relation
- S/o. Samuvel Devid
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Another
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Execution Petition Dismissal
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Dismissal of the Execution Petition for default
Evidence:
Petitioner not present. Even after giving repeated chances for enquiry the petitioner has not entitled and not present. Hence the EP is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thirunnavaya Service Co- Operative Bank Ltd. vs Premraj Devid and Another regarding execution under Order 21 Rule 64,66
Case Code Year
Case between Thirunnavaya Service Co- Operative Bank Ltd. vs Premraj Devid and Another regarding execution under Order 21 Rule 64,66