Case Summary
The case involves Thilothama Karthikeyan as the plaintiff seeking enforcement of a decree against the judgment debtors, George Peter and others. The court ordered full satisfaction of the decree on 18th August 2025.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
E.P.
Final Judgment
No
The court recorded full satisfaction regarding the enforcement of the decree in favor of the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found full satisfaction recorded for the decree.
The court found full satisfaction recorded for the decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found full satisfaction recorded for the decree.
The court found full satisfaction recorded for the decree.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that delivery was effected and no further steps were reported.
Judgment Evidence:
Full satisfaction recorded. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 18th day of August, 2025)
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thilothama Karthikeyan
- Party Age
- 78
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- George Peter
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Celine George
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vinod George
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raju George
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ebal K.E
- Party Age
- 13
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. B Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Denizen Komath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shimi Mol S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Dean Denizen Komath
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rekha V
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anju K.A
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anusree K
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Full satisfaction recorded.
Evidence:
Full satisfaction recorded.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
E.P.
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thilothama Karthikeyan vs George Peter et al regarding E.P No. 361/2024
Case Code Year
Case between Thilothama Karthikeyan vs George Peter et al regarding E.P No. 361/2024