Case Summary
Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank filed an execution petition under order 21 Rule 37,38 of the Code of Civil Procedure which was dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the respondents.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Execution Petition Dismissal
Case Type
Civil Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the execution petition for default due to non-appearance of the respondents.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
No batta seen deposited. No representation. Hence EP is dismissed for default
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sameer. M. Mashboob
- Relation
- S/o. Kunhayishu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nofel
- Relation
- S/o. Kunhayishu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nazer.P
- Relation
- S/o. Muhammad Kutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Execution Petition Dismissal
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Execution petition dismissed for default due to non-appearance of respondents
Evidence:
No batta seen deposited. No representation. Hence EP is dismissed for default
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Execution Petition
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank vs Sameer M. Mashboob et al regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank vs Sameer M. Mashboob et al regarding execution petition