Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 112/2015

Case between Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank vs Sadasivan et al regarding payment satisfaction

Court
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Sri. Biju. V.G
Order Date
2015-07-17
Duration
0 years, 3 months, 11 days
Case Code No.
112
Case Closed
Fri, 07/17/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank filed a case against multiple judgment debtors for payment. The judgment debtors paid the full amount, leading to the closure of the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The respondent paid the full amount, leading to complete satisfaction of the petition.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Full payment satisfaction
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The respondent paid the full amount, leading to complete satisfaction of the petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Respondent paid the full amount and counsel filed a memo to that effect, resulting in complete satisfaction as recorded by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Respondent paid the full amount and counsel filed a memo to that effect, resulting in complete satisfaction as recorded by the court.
Supporting Evidence
Respondent paid full amount. Counsel for petition filed a memo to that effect.

Judgment Evidence:

Respondent paid full amount. Counsel for petition filed a memo to that effect. Hence full satisfaction recorded. Petition is closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sadasivan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Khamarudheen
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subrahmanyan
Plaintiffs Documents
Memo filed by the counsel
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N.V.Bindu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Payment Satisfaction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondent paid the full amount resulting in complete satisfaction.
Evidence:
Respondent paid full amount. Counsel for petition filed a memo to that effect. Hence full satisfaction recorded.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2015

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 04/10/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 07/17/2015 - 12:00
From
Wed, 07/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Fri, 07/31/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Raghunandanan. M.V. et al regarding decree transmission
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between The Secretary vs Ammiyangara Viswanathan regarding debt satisfaction
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Secretary vs Chamaparambil Kari et al regarding enforcement of decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Dismissed
Case between Secretary, Thennala Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. vs Surendran et al regarding debt repayment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Secretary vs Abdul Azeez et al regarding financial dispute
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won