Case Summary
Thennala Service Co-operative Bank filed an execution petition against Jyothish.N, Umesh.P, and Jaleel seeking relief under Order 21 Rules 37 and 38 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which was later dismissed due to non-appearance of respondents.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Applicable - Petition Dismissed
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the execution petition as the respondents did not appear.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
No batta seen deposited. No representation. Hence EP is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thennala Service Co-operative Bank
- Relation
- Represented by its secretary
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jyothish.N
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o. Ramankutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Umesh.P
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- S/o. Kutten
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jaleel
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o. Hamza
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thennala Service Co-operative Bank vs Jyothish.N et al regarding Execution Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Thennala Service Co-operative Bank vs Jyothish.N et al regarding Execution Petition