Case Summary
Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank filed an execution petition against Firoz, Abbaz, and Ashraf to recover a debt, but the petition was dismissed due to lack of representation for the petitioners.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Execution Petition Dismissed
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition filed by Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank was dismissed due to lack of representation for the petitioners.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
No representation for the petitioner. It is posted for enquiry regarding means of R1 and for issuance of notice to R2 and the repeated Arrest warrant against R3.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence EP is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank
- Relation
- Represented by 1st Secretary
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Firoz
- Relation
- S/o. Moideen Kutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abbaz
- Relation
- S/o. Alavi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ashraf
- Relation
- S/o. Muhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Execution Petition Dismissal
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Execution petition filed by Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence EP is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank vs Firoz et al regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank vs Firoz et al regarding execution petition