Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
KLML130011952015

Case between Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank vs Fasal et al regarding execution petition.

Court
Munsiff Magistrate AT Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V (In Charge)
Order Date
2016-07-29
Duration
0 years, 7 months, 28 days
Case Closed
Fri, 07/29/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank filed an execution petition against Fasal and others. The execution petition was dismissed for default as the judgment debtors were reported abroad.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the judgment debtors who were reported abroad.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the judgment debtors who were reported abroad.
Key Reasoning:
The dismissal of the case was due to the reported unavailability of the judgment debtors.
Why Defendant Won:
The dismissal of the case was due to the reported unavailability of the judgment debtors.
Supporting Evidence
Hence EP is dismissed for default.

Judgment Evidence:

R1 to R3 reported abroad. Hence EP is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fasal
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Shareef
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Sathar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N.V.Sindhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
appearing for Fasal
Appearance Type
Unknown
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
appearing for 2, 3 respectively
Appearance Type
Unknown

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Execution Petition dismissed for default due to the judgment debtors being reported abroad.
Evidence:
R1 to R3 reported abroad. Hence EP is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank vs Fasal et al regarding execution petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Thennala Service Co-Operative Bank vs Fasal et al regarding execution petition.

Quick Facts

Location
Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 12/16/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 07/29/2016 - 12:00
From
Fri, 07/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Fri, 07/31/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Secretary vs Muhammedkutty et al regarding full satisfaction of the execution petition.
Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sri.Amjad.M. regarding EP
Munsiff Magistrate AT Tirur
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Abdul Salam et al regarding Execution Petition
Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Koyamoideen regarding Execution Petition
Munsiff Magistrate AT Tirur
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Abdul Salam regarding Execution Petition
Munsiff Magistrate AT Tirur
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won