Case Summary
Execution petition filed by Thennala Service Co-operative bank under order 21 Rule 11(2) r/w Rule 38 of the Code of Civil Procedure against two respondents, where the EP was dismissed due to the respondent being reported abroad.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed as the respondent Abdul Razak was reported to be abroad.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Respondent is reported abroad. Hence EP dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thennala Service Co-operative bank
- Relation
- Represented by secretary
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Razak
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o. Bapputty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Nizar
- Party Age
- 30
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Execution of Decree
Outcome:
Not Granted
Description:
Execution petition dismissed as respondent Abdul Razak is reported abroad.
Evidence:
Respondent is reported abroad. Hence EP dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thennala Service Co-operative bank vs Abdul Razak et al regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between Thennala Service Co-operative bank vs Abdul Razak et al regarding execution petition