Case Summary
Decree holder Thazhathethil Raman filed a case against Santha seeking to amend the Decree Schedule. The court dismissed the case as the decree schedule was not amended despite repeated opportunities.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case as the decree schedule was not amended despite repeated opportunities.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The property is not identification. Even after giving repeated opportunities the petitioner did not amend the decree schedule. Hence there is no need to proceed with this EP. Hence dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thazhathethil Raman
- Party Age
- 56
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Santha
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Santha
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Amendment of Decree Schedule
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Decree schedule not amended despite repeated opportunities.
Evidence:
The property is not identification. Even after giving repeated opportunities the petitioner did not amend the decree schedule. Hence there is no need to proceed with this EP. Hence dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Agreements and Documents
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2016