Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 186 OF 20 16

Case between Thattarakkal Moideenkutty vs Ismail regarding possession recovery

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-10-26
Duration
1 year
Case Closed
Thu, 10/26/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Thattarakkal Moideenkutty filed a suit against defendant Ismail for recovery of possession, which was settled in mediation. The terms of the mediation agreement included an enhanced rent payment by the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for recovery of possession was dismissed as per the terms of the lawful mediation agreement with the defendant agreeing to pay an enhanced rent.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Possession Recovery
Final Judgment
No
The suit for recovery of possession was dismissed as per the terms of the lawful mediation agreement with the defendant agreeing to pay an enhanced rent.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for recovery of possession. Settled in mediation, Since terms of mediation agreement is lawful, it is recorded as follows. 1.Defendant has agreed to pay an enhanced rent @ Rs. 2500/- from 2017 August onwards.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thattarakkal Moideenkutty
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o. Alikkanakath Beeran Kutty Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ismail
Relation
S/o. Abdulla
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney, etc.
Defendants Documents
Unknown

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not Decided
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Suit for recovery of possession
Evidence:
Suit for recovery of possession. Settled in mediation, Since terms of mediation agreement is lawful, it is recorded as follows. 1.Defendant has agreed to pay an enhanced rent @ Rs. 2500/- from 2017 August onwards.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Used in the case
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Possession Recovery
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Thattarakkal Moideenkutty vs Ismail regarding possession recovery
Case Code Year
Case between Thattarakkal Moideenkutty vs Ismail regarding possession recovery

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 10/26/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 10/26/2017 - 12:00
From
Sun, 10/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Tue, 10/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Pulikkalakath Aboobacker's children vs Naduparambil Muhammed Ali regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Hamza Haji vs Chakkalakkal Harif et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Unniveettil Vinesh vs Velalkandiparambil Gopinathan regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Kunnathodi Sarada et al vs Puliyakkathodi Kolavan et al regarding delivery of property
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhu Haji et al vs Firoz regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Property Delivery Plaintiff Won