Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 188 OF 20 16

Case between Thattarakkal Moideenkutty et al vs Velayudhan regarding possession recovery settlement

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-10-26
Duration
Unknown
Case Closed
Tue, 08/01/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff sought recovery of possession which was settled in mediation. The rent for the room was enhanced to Rs. 2500 per month with a 5% annual increase.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The suit for recovery of possession was dismissed as the parties settled in mediation agreement for an enhanced rent of Rs. 2500 with a 5% annual increase.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Recovery of possession - Settlement
Final Judgment
No
The suit for recovery of possession was dismissed as the parties settled in mediation agreement for an enhanced rent of Rs. 2500 with a 5% annual increase.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for recovery of possession. Settled in mediation, As per the terms of mediation the rent of the room has been enhanced to Rs. 2500/- and the defendant agreed to pay rent at Rs. 2500/- from 2017 August onwards. It is also agreed by both parties for enhancement of rent at 5% per annum. Since the terms of mediation agreement is lawful, the suit is dismissed as per terms of agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thattarakkal Moideenkutty
Party Age
55
Relation
Son of Alikkanakath Beeran Kutty Haji
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mehroof
Party Age
36
Relation
Son of Saithalavi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Velayudhan
Party Age
70
Relation
Son of Velayudhan
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Chandrasekhar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Vipin Chandrasekhar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.A. Padmakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown
Outcome: Unknown
Description:
Unknown
Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Recovery of possession - Settlement
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thattarakkal Moideenkutty et al vs Velayudhan regarding possession recovery settlement
Case Code Year
Case between Thattarakkal Moideenkutty et al vs Velayudhan regarding possession recovery settlement

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 08/01/2017 - 12:00
From
Sun, 10/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Tue, 10/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza Haji vs Chakkalakkal Harif et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Unniveettil Vinesh vs Velalkandiparambil Gopinathan regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Kunnathodi Sarada et al vs Puliyakkathodi Kolavan et al regarding delivery of property
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhu Haji et al vs Firoz regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Property Delivery Plaintiff Won
Case between N.Sounder Rajan et al vs Abu regarding specific performance of contract
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Specific Performance Dismissed