Case Summary
Thattarakandiyil Prabhakaran is the decree holder, while Girija and others are the judgment debtors. The case involves issues relating to a decree that requires some corrections, leading to the dismissal of the enforcement petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that there were corrections needed in the decree, thus the execution petition could not proceed and was dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
The execution petition was dismissed because the decree required corrections.
The execution petition was dismissed because the decree required corrections.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
As it is submitted that there are some correction is to be and in the decree itself.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence EP can not be proceeded with. Hence dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thattarakandiyil Prabhakaran
- Party Age
- 56
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Girija
- Party Age
- 36
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nishad
- Party Age
- 31
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Karthiayani
- Party Age
- 66
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.P.Munavar Fyrooz
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2016