Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1130 /2024

Case between Tharif vs Pradeep et al regarding rejection of suit.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-05-27
Duration
Case Code No.
1130
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Tharif is the plaintiff against Pradeep and Aswathy regarding a civil suit that was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff did not remit the required court fee and did not file an application.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by Tharif was rejected as there was no balance court fee remitted and no application filed. The court made this determination under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by Tharif was rejected as there was no balance court fee remitted and no application filed. The court made this determination under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to comply with procedural requirements regarding court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to comply with procedural requirements regarding court fees.
Supporting Evidence
No balance court fee seen remitted. No application also seen filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Tharif
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pradeep
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aswathy
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Angel Albert
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to no balance court fee remitted.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won