Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 290 OF 2014

Case between Tharayil Chandran vs Veluthedath Valappil Kunhukakuttan et al regarding property partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-07-10
Duration
2 years 8 months 18 days
Case Closed
Mon, 07/10/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Tharayil Chandran filed a suit against defendants seeking partition of plaint B schedule property, claiming 6/72 shares in the property previously owned by his maternal grandfather.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court passed a preliminary decree for partition, granting plaintiff 6/72 shares in the plaint B schedule property, with other defendants receiving their respective shares.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition Decree
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The court passed a preliminary decree for partition, granting plaintiff 6/72 shares in the plaint B schedule property, with other defendants receiving their respective shares.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided convincing evidence of his relationship and entitlement to a share in the property, supported by documents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided convincing evidence of his relationship and entitlement to a share in the property, supported by documents.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff presented valid documents establishing his mother's relationship to Velu and his entitlement to a share in the property, which the defendants failed to disprove conclusively.

Judgment Evidence:

The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 72 equal shares. The plaintiff is entitled to 6 shares, the first defendant to 30 shares, the second defendant to 6 shares, and defendants 3 to 8 to 5 shares each.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Tharayil Chandran
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o. Gopalan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Veluthedath Valappil Kunhukakuttan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o. Valu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Janaki
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o. Damodaran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Veluthedath Valappil Malukkutty
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o. Appu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Veluthedath Valappil Babu Raj
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o. (Late) Appu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Veluthedath Valappil Prajeesh
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o. (Late) Appu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Veluthedath Valappil Praji
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o. (Late) Appu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Veluthedath Valappil Chithra
Party Age
23
Relation
D/o. (Late) Appu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Veluthedath Valappil Sivan
Party Age
20
Relation
S/o. (Late) Appu
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Jenm assignment deed, Extract of admission register, Registered lawyer notice, Certified copy of application for school admission form, Assignment deed, Certificate of encumbrance of property
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition decree
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Granted partition of the plaint B schedule property among parties
Evidence:
Preliminary decree passed for partitioning the property as per shared allotment

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showed ownership details of the property
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Extract of admission register
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documented relationships for claim of shares
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicated formal demand for partition
Reference:
A5
Document Type: Certified copy of application for school admission form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supporting evidence for educational history
Reference:
A6
Document Type: Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documented older property transactions for purchasing new property
Reference:
A7
Document Type: Certificate of encumbrance of property
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showed property encumbrance details
Reference:
A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Property Partition
Case Code
Case between Tharayil Chandran vs Veluthedath Valappil Kunhukakuttan et al regarding property partition
Case Code Year
Case between Tharayil Chandran vs Veluthedath Valappil Kunhukakuttan et al regarding property partition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 12/02/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 07/10/2017 - 12:00
From
Sat, 07/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 07/14/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Naseera et al vs Moideenkutty et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ammunni et al vs Velukkutty et al regarding partition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Partition Partial
Case between Saseendran vs Lakshmi-D1 regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Unknown
Case between T.V. Yousaf vs Muhammed Kutty et al regarding partition of properties
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between K. Sreedevi vs K. Sankaranarayanan @ Unni regarding partition and share of profits
Court of the Munsiff, Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won