Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Thankappan Nair and Sumathy Amma, brought a suit against the defendants, Rachel Pathros and Paulose. The case was dismissed for default due to no representation or evidence being presented.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiffs' failure to take steps to present evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thankappan Nair
- Party Age
- 85
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sumathy Amma
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rachel Pathros @ Thankamma Pathros
- Party Age
- 86
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Paulose
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M/s. K A Benny, Gokul Gopi and Keerthana S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
No representation. No steps taken for exparte evidence. Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thankappan Nair et al vs Rachel Pathros et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Thankappan Nair et al vs Rachel Pathros et al regarding dismissal for default