Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.707/2020

Case between Thankamani.S vs Prathibha Mohan regarding court fee remittance.

Court
The Additional Munsiff-III
Judge
Smt. Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-01-13
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 01/13/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Thankamani.S filed a suit against Prathibha Mohan regarding a court fee issue. The court rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that both parties were represented but the plaintiff did not remit the balance court fee. Consequently, the plaint was rejected.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that both parties were represented but the plaintiff did not remit the balance court fee. Consequently, the plaint was rejected.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to the failure to remit the balance court fee, according to the applicable rules.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected due to the failure to remit the balance court fee, according to the applicable rules.
Supporting Evidence
Both side represented. Balance Court Fee not remitted.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is rejected U/s Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure. (Pronounced in open court on this the 13th day of January,2025.)

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thankamani.S
Party Age
70
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prathibha Mohan
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Shiny Rani A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Celine Fernandez
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Pradeep Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Rejection of the plaint due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected U/s Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thankamani.S vs Prathibha Mohan regarding court fee remittance.
Case Code Year
Case between Thankamani.S vs Prathibha Mohan regarding court fee remittance.

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 01/13/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won