Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 327/ 2025

Case between Thankamani vs Rethnamma et al regarding injunction against encroachment.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-09-17
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Thankamani, the petitioner, is seeking an ad-interim injunction against the respondents to prevent encroachment on her property. The court found a prima facie case for the injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an injunction to prevent respondents from encroaching on the property of the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction granted.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an injunction to prevent respondents from encroaching on the property of the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found a prima facie case for the injunction based on the evidence presented.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found a prima facie case for the injunction based on the evidence presented.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A. will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondents are restrained from encroaching into plaint schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thankamani
Party Age
68
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rethnamma
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shyna
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shami
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sindhu
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Plaint, affidavit and other documents produced.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction restraining respondents from encroaching into plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
the respondents are restrained from encroaching into plaint schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further orders

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Plaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court perused the plaint for the hearing.
Reference:
Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit for the hearing.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thankamani vs Rethnamma et al regarding injunction against encroachment.
Case Code Year
Case between Thankamani vs Rethnamma et al regarding injunction against encroachment.

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won