Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 204/2016

Case between Thankamani T.V et al vs Subrahmanian et al regarding property delivery

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Smt. Vincy. T.V
Order Date
2018-02-26
Duration
1 year, 5 months, 17 days
Case Code No.
204
Case Closed
Mon, 02/26/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Decree holder Thankamani T.V filed a case against judgment debtors seeking property delivery, which was decided by the court with the property being delivered and the execution petition closed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the delivery of the property, and the execution petition was closed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property Delivery
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the delivery of the property, and the execution petition was closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Property delivered. Delivery recorded. EP closed.

Judgment Evidence:

Property delivered. Delivery recorded. EP closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thankamani T.V
Party Age
67
Relation
Decree Holder
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subrahmanian
Party Age
54
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijayalakshmi.T.V.
Party Age
57
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hariharasudhan.T.V.
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lakshmi.T.V.
Party Age
65
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.V.Krishnaswami
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saraswathi
Party Age
56
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Preethi.G.Nair
Party Age
41
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajaykumar.P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate - Appearing for Subrahmanian, Appearing for Vijayalakshmi.T.V., Appearing for Hariharasudhan.T.V., Appearing for Lakshmi.T.V., Appearing for T.V.Krishnaswami (deceased), Appearing for Saraswathi, Appearing for Preethi.G.Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Property Delivery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court ordered the delivery of the property.
Evidence:
Property delivered. Delivery recorded. EP closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2016

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 09/09/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 02/26/2018 - 12:00
From
Thu, 02/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Wed, 02/28/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Decree Holder

Similar Cases

Case between Thachoth Ayamma et al vs Alukkal Koya regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Illyas vs Thahira-R1 regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff-Magistrate
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Amina et al vs Kunhibava et al regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Chandran vs Sulochana regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Aboobakar vs Abdul Salam et al regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won