Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Thankamani and Leela, are involved in a property dispute with the defendants, Rajendran and Padmaja Kumari. They sought legal resolution after presenting various evidence and testimonies.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thankamani
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Leela
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajendran
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Padmaja Kumari
- Party Age
- 54
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement dated 31.07.2006, Letter from Wills Memorial Church Mangad dated 24.04.2019, Certified copy of the Judgment in A.S. No. 237/2011 dated 26.03.2013, Certified copy of the Commission Report in OS.No.2130/2008 dated 30.12.2008, Certified copy of the FIR in Crime No. 739/2019 dated 27.04.2019, Copy of the Final Report dated 27.04.2019, Certified Copy of the First Information Statement dated 28.06.2019, Copy obtained under the RTI dated 29.02.2020, Copy of the Complaint dated 16.09.2020
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Thirumala K. Bijukumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.A.G. Girish Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Veena.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as an exhibit for the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Letter from Wills Memorial Church
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as an exhibit for the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Certified copy of the judgment
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as an exhibit for the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Certified copy of the commission report
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as an exhibit for the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Certified copy of the FIR
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as an exhibit for the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Copy of the Final Report
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as an exhibit for the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Certified Copy of the First Information Statement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as an exhibit for the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type:
Copy of the report obtained under the RTI
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as an exhibit for the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type:
Copy of the complaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as an exhibit for the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type:
Commission Report & Rough Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
This document was marked as an exhibit for the court.
Reference:
Ext.C1 & C1(a)
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020