Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 16 / 2021

Case between Thankachan vs Omana regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Judge
Smt. Sirsha.N.A
Order Date
2023-12-18
Duration
approximately-2 years 9 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a dispute between Thankachan, the plaintiff, and Omana, the defendant, regarding the fixation of property boundaries and the removal of an encroaching structure. The plaintiff seeks to prevent any further construction that may damage his property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed, and the injunction order granted to the plaintiff continues until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed, and the injunction order granted to the plaintiff continues until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that there was no change in circumstances to vacate the injunction order.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner has not brought forward any change in circumstances or that she has suffered any undue hardship.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: - the petition is dismissed and the order of injunction granted to the plaintiff continues until further orders with no costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thankachan
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Omana
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Settlement deed bearing No 170/2011 of the Puthencruz SRO
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.Devanand
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aparna P.Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.Ravikumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Akhil George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.A.Benny
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioner is seeking vacation of the injunction order.
Evidence:
Hence point no 2 is found against the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thankachan vs Omana regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Thankachan vs Omana regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Case Filed
Thu, 03/25/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 01/01/2023 - 12:00
To
Sun, 12/31/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Komalvalliyamma vs Meera et al regarding partition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between P.M.Gopalakrishnan Nair et al vs Adv.P.R.Rajan et al regarding declaration of easement right of way and injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anie Ittan W/o Ittan et al vs Kurian S/o Joseph regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The Court of the Munsiff Kolenchery
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shibi Baby W/o Baby Joseph vs George S/o Paulose regarding declaration and injunction
THE MUNSIFF AT KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shibi Baby, W/o Baby Joseph et al vs George S/o Paulose regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won