Case Summary
Thadathil Ismalu filed a restoration petition against Aboobacker and others. The case concluded with an order allowing the petition contingent upon a deposit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of petition with conditional cost deposit
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The order demonstrates that the conditions for restoration were accepted by the court, which led to the granting of the petition.
The order demonstrates that the conditions for restoration were accepted by the court, which led to the granting of the petition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
Plaintiffs Documents
Documentation supporting the legitimacy of the original position of the petitioner.
Defendants Documents
Responses and counter filings by the defendants.
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
District
State
Court Establishment
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thadathil Ismalu vs Aboobacker, Appu alias Velayudha, Kannan, Sankaran, Kunhimuhammed Haji, and Kunhimuhammed regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Thadathil Ismalu vs Aboobacker, Appu alias Velayudha, Kannan, Sankaran, Kunhimuhammed Haji, and Kunhimuhammed regarding restoration petition