Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 828/2022

Case between Tessy Jose vs Col.G.Pramod Kumar regarding recovery of rent and damages.

Court
THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-12-18
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 months
Case Closed
Wed, 12/18/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Tessy Jose claims unpaid rent and damages from the defendant Col.G.Pramod Kumar for leasing property. The defendant denies owing the claimed amount and asserts mutual agreement on rent reduction due to the pandemic.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed both the plaintiff's suit and the defendant's counterclaim.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed both the plaintiff's suit and the defendant's counterclaim.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the defendant had not paid rent for the specified period, but had already deposited a security amount which was sufficient to cover the claims of the plaintiff.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the defendant had not paid rent for the specified period, but had already deposited a security amount which was sufficient to cover the claims of the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The court determined that the security amount deposited by the defendant could be adjusted against the claims of the plaintiff, implying no excess dues were established.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit and the counter claim are dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Tessy Jose
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Col.G.Pramod Kumar (Retd)
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Office copy of lawyer notice, Reply lawyer notice, Receipt issued by Senior Superintendent and Public Information Officer, KSEB, Vytilla, Receipt issued by KSEB, Vytilla.
Defendants Documents
Letter, Letter, Copy of agreement.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajesh Cherian Karippaparambil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.K.Muraleedharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff seeks recovery of ₹ 2,83,636 including arrears of rent and interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit and the counter claim are dismissed.
Relief Type: Set-off
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Defendant claims set-off of ₹ 2,00,000 security deposit against alleged arrears.
Evidence:
Even though the defendant claims this as set-off, the same can be considered only as adjustment.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Reply Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reply lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Receipt from KSEB
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt issued by Senior Superintendent and Public Information Officer, KSEB.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Receipt from KSEB
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt issued by KSEB in consumer no.115562014307.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Letter requesting the defendant to vacate premises.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Letter conveying reduction of rent due to discussions.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Copy of agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of the lease agreement between the parties.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Consumer Profile Details
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Consumer profile details pertaining to electricity connection.
Reference:
Ext.X1
Document Type: Collection History
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Collection history related to consumer.
Reference:
Ext.X1(a)
Document Type: Account Summary Statement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Account summary statement of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.X2
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Account statement bearing account no 10580100043354.
Reference:
Ext.X3
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Statement of account bearing no 57039385483.
Reference:
Ext.X4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Tessy Jose vs Col.G.Pramod Kumar regarding recovery of rent and damages.
Case Code Year
Case between Tessy Jose vs Col.G.Pramod Kumar regarding recovery of rent and damages.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 12/18/2024 - 12:00
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won