Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 752/2020

Case between T.B.Hassainar vs T.B.Mohammed Ali et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-02-13
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

T.B.Hassainar filed a suit against T.B.Mohammed Ali and others. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of both the plaintiff and defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default. Pronounced by me in open court on this the 13th day of February, 2024.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

T.B.Hassainar (51 years years) Theenathu house, Indrevaram, Souhrda Nagar, North Kalamassery P.O, Thrikkakkara North village, Kannayannur taluk, pin – 683 104.

Defendants

T.B.Mohammed Ali (55 years years) Nucleus mobiles, 1st floor, Penta Menaka, Shanmugan road, Ernakulam – 682 301. T.B.Sara Beevi (53 years years) Kunnapalli house, Manjapettee, Mudical P.O, pin – 683 547. Sulekha (49 years years) Kandanath veleth veethil, vallapuzhavillage, parambi via, pin – 679 336. Jameela (45 years years) Majeed Manzil, Choorakode, vallapuzha village, Patambi via, Palakkad district, Pin – 679 336. T.B.Nazar (43 years years) IV/819, Theenattu house, Ottapalam road, Cherupulassery P.O, Palakkad District, Pin – 679 503.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases