Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 752/2020

Case between T.B.Hassainar vs T.B.Mohammed Ali et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-02-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

T.B.Hassainar filed a suit against T.B.Mohammed Ali and others. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of both the plaintiff and defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of both the plaintiff and defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default. Pronounced by me in open court on this the 13th day of February, 2024.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.B.Hassainar
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o late T.H.Bava
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.B.Mohammed Ali
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o Late T.H.Bava
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.B.Sara Beevi
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o Late T.H.Bava
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulekha
Party Age
49
Relation
D/o late T.H.Bava
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jameela
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o Late T.H.Bava
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.B.Nazar
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o late T.H.Bava
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.V.Ashim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sunil V Mohammed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Neethumol M.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ajitha Appu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.R.Rughunathan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Balakrishnan.R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B.Harrylal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.A.Aziz
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Silpa Aziz
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mamatha P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dhanya P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between T.B.Hassainar vs T.B.Mohammed Ali et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between T.B.Hassainar vs T.B.Mohammed Ali et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won