Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 198/2013

Case between Tanalur Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Bavahajinte Purakkal Isahaq et al regarding default dismissal

Court
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Sri. Biju. V.G
Order Date
2014-08-05
Duration
0 years, 11 months, 10 days
Case Code No.
198
Case Closed
Tue, 08/05/2014 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Tanalur Service Co-operative Bank Ltd filed a petition seeking decree against the judgment debtors. The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to serve notice to the respondents.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to serve notice to the respondents.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to serve notice to the respondents.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner failed to serve notice to the respondents.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The petitioner failed to take steps for issuing notice to respondents. Hence the petition is dismissed for default

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bavahajinte Purakkal Isahaq
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chakkintepurakkal Bapputty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Beerantepurakkal Hamzakutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.T.Balakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate for Bavahajinte Purakkal Isahaq
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate for Chakkintepurakkal Bapputty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate for Beerantepurakkal Hamzakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Dismissal
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Dismissal of the petition for default
Evidence:
The petitioner failed to take steps for issuing notice to respondents. Hence the petition is dismissed for default

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2013

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 08/30/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 08/05/2014 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2014 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Raghunandanan. M.V. et al regarding decree transmission
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between The Secretary vs Ammiyangara Viswanathan regarding debt satisfaction
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenivasan vs Ashraf regarding execution of decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Secretary vs Chamaparambil Kari et al regarding enforcement of decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Dismissed
Case between Secretary, Thennala Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. vs Surendran et al regarding debt repayment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won