Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1034/2022

Case between Taaji Biju vs Mini Shaji regarding Suit for Civil Procedure

Court
COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-15
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are Taaji Biju and Ansel B Mathew. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of both parties on the hearing date.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and the representation of the defendants. No proof affidavit was filed by the plaintiffs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and the representation of the defendants. No proof affidavit was filed by the plaintiffs.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit dismissed for default. Pronounced by me in open court on this the 15th day of March, 2024.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Taaji Biju
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ansel B Mathew
Party Age
20
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mini Shaji
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
George A Abraham
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sanil Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Santhosh Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arun Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Veena Raveendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Karthika Maria
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anil Sebastian Pulickal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Abi Benny Areeckal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Leah Rachel Ninan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Taaji Biju vs Mini Shaji regarding Suit for Civil Procedure
Case Code Year
Case between Taaji Biju vs Mini Shaji regarding Suit for Civil Procedure

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won