Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.78/2019

Case between T P Mathai et al vs Fr. Mathai Edayanal Cor Episcopa et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Judge
St. Sirsha. N.A.
Order Date
2024-01-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, T P Mathai and T M Rajan, are involved in a suit against Fr. Mathai Edayanal Cor Episcopa and others. The court dismissed the case for default as the plaintiffs were absent and had sought time for withdrawal without filing a petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case as the plaintiffs were absent without representation and had not filed a withdrawal petition.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case as the plaintiffs were absent without representation and had not filed a withdrawal petition.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and did not submit a withdrawal petition.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and did not submit a withdrawal petition.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Plaintiff has several times sought time for withdrawal petition. But no petition is filed yet.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence dismissed for default. Pronounced in the open court, on this the 27th day of January, 2024.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T P Mathai
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T M Rajan
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fr. Mathai Edayanal Cor Episcopa
Party Age
85
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
St Mary’s Orthodox Syrian Church
Relation
represented by its Trustee
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Vicar, St Mary’s Orthodox Syrian Church
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Trustee, St Mary’s Orthodox Syrian Church
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Secretary, St Mary’s Orthodox Syrian Church
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M/s. Sabu Thozhuppadan K, Adv. V K Kishor, Adv. Ajwin P Lalson and Adv. A A Rasheeda
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Paul K Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Dismissal of the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to file a withdrawal petition.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Plaintiff has several times sought time for withdrawal petition. But no petition is filed yet. Hence dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between T P Mathai et al vs Fr. Mathai Edayanal Cor Episcopa et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between T P Mathai et al vs Fr. Mathai Edayanal Cor Episcopa et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Deepa S Vijayan vs Sundaram Finance Ltd et al regarding ad-interim injunction.
Court of the Munsiff Kolenchery
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Pathrose Jacob vs R.C Central Charitable Trust regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Greenland Particle Boards Private Limited vs Abdul Azeem Mohammed Koya regarding withdrawal of suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Marambilly Service Co-operative Bank No.E-265 vs Anvar regarding recovery of decreetal amount
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ibrahim and Rahna vs Poulose et al regarding restoration of a suit
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won