Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.217/2019

Case between Syndicate Bank vs Sidik.A regarding realisation of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-11-04
Duration
approximately-10 years 6 months
Case Closed
Tue, 11/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Syndicate Bank filed a suit against Sidik.A for the recovery of a vehicle loan amount of Rs.2,17,684.03/- along with interest. The defendant failed to appear in court, leading to the case proceeding ex parte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of defaulted loan amount along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹2,17,684.03/- from the defendant and his assets.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of defaulted loan amount along with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved that the defendant owed the amount claimed in the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved that the defendant owed the amount claimed in the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of the plaintiff is unchallenged because the defendant was set exparte and PW1 was not cross-examined.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1. Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹2,17,684.03/- from the defendant and his assets. 2. Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 10.75% per annum with monthly rests from 04/06/2015 till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Syndicate Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sidik.A
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application dated 29/04/2015, Proforma Invoice dated 01/03/2015, Receipt dated 04/05/2015, Composite Hypothecation Agreement dated 04/05/2015, Acknowledgment of Debt dated 03/05/2018, Lawyer’s Notice dated 29/08/2018, Statement of Account from 04/05/2015 to 31/12/2018
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Balakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to recover the loan amount from the defendant.
Evidence:
Therefore, the Plaintiff is entitled to recover defaulted loan amount of Rs.2,17,684.03/- with future agreed interest at the prevailing interest rate of 10.75% per annum with monthly rest from the defendant.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to recover interest on the loan amount.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 10.75% per annum with monthly rests from 04/06/2015 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to recover future interest.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to recover costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Loan application submitted by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Proforma Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proforma invoice related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt for the loan disbursal.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Composite Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement for hypothecation related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment by the defendant regarding the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Lawyer's notice demanding repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement showing the transaction history of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Syndicate Bank vs Sidik.A regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Syndicate Bank vs Sidik.A regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 05/04/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 11/04/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won