Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1906/2019

Case between Syamkumar et al vs Jayalekshmi Amma et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
Case Code No.
1906
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Syamkumar, Latha, and Sreekumar, brought a suit against the defendants, Jayalekshmi Amma and Dhaneesh. The case was dismissed as the plaintiffs did not turn up for the hearings.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found no reason to proceed with the suit as the plaintiffs failed to appear. Consequently, the suit was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court found no reason to proceed with the suit as the plaintiffs failed to appear. Consequently, the suit was dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not appear for the hearings.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs did not appear for the hearings.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs did not turn up for the hearings.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence I find no reason to proceed with this suit. Suit stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Syamkumar
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o Late Divakaran
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Latha
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o Madhu
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreekumar
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o Late Divakaran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayalekshmi Amma
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o Muraleedharan Nair
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dhaneesh
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o Muraleedharan Nair
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. L.S.Renjith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.R. Swaminathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Sujay Sankar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. B.Satheesan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Rita Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won