Case Summary
Syamkrishna is the plaintiff and Xavier is the defendant in this case. The plaintiff was continuously absent for several court postings, leading to the suit being dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was continuously absent, leading to dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff was continuously absent, leading to dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was continuously absent, leading to dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff was continuously absent, leading to dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff no representation. Defendant represented. Plaintiff is continuously absent, for the last several postings.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Syamkrishna
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Xavier
- Party Age
- 84
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.A. Mohammed Salih
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Syamkrishna vs Xavier regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Syamkrishna vs Xavier regarding dismissal for default