Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.364/2022

Case between Suseela vs Prasad, Venugopal regarding dismissal for default.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-09-02
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Suseela is the plaintiff in this case against defendants Prasad and Venugopal. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and failure to appear in court, despite prior directions.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and failure to appear in court, despite prior directions.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suseela
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasad
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Venugopal
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.P. Jyothi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajesh Padmanabhan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.N. Manmadan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Prabhumuralikrishna
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Swapna N.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sarun Rajan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Suseela vs Prasad, Venugopal regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Suseela vs Prasad, Venugopal regarding dismissal for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won