Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.364/2022

Case between Suseela vs Prasad, Venugopal regarding dismissal for default.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-09-02
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Suseela is the plaintiff in this case against defendants Prasad and Venugopal. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and failure to appear in court, despite prior directions.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Suseela (61 years) Padachira House, Ayyankali Road, Poonithura, Kochi­682038, Ernakulam District.

Defendants

Prasad (54 years) Thundiparambil, Ayyamkali Road, South end, Poonithura, Kochi­682038, Ernakulam District. Venugopal (58 years) Thundiparambil, Ayyamkali Road, South end, Poonithura, Kochi­682038, Ernakulam District.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases