Case Summary
The case involves a petition filed by Suseela .N against N . Lekshmanan and others. The petitioner was absent during the hearing, leading to the petition being dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the petition because the petitioner was absent and no representation was made.
The court dismissed the petition because the petitioner was absent and no representation was made.
Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the petition because the petitioner was absent and no representation was made.
The court dismissed the petition because the petitioner was absent and no representation was made.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner absent, no representation. Petition dismissed for default.
Judgment Evidence:
The petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suseela .N
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- N . Lekshmanan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- N. Thankamani
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lalitha
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Shameem
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Petition dismissed for default
Evidence:
Petitioner absent, no representation. R3 and F7 absent, represented. Petitioner called absent, no representation on his part. Petition dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.
Case Code Year
2023