Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
E.P. 73/2024

Case between Suseela Babu vs Pala Marketing Co Operative Society et al regarding Execution Petition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-06-10
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Suseela Babu, the decree holder, is involved in an execution petition against Pala Marketing Co Operative Society and its officials. The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the decree holder and lack of steps taken to produce necessary documents.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the decree holder failed to appear and did not take necessary steps to progress the petition, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder was absent and did not produce required documents.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence EP dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Suseela Babu (51 years years) Kallingal House, Near to Rubber Park, Irapuram Kara, North Mazhuvannoor P O, Ernakulam, Pin-683 556

Defendants

Pala Marketing Co Operative Society (Age not specified years) Plot No. 16 site A, Rubber park, Valayanchira P O, Pin-683 556 Secretary, Pala marketing Co-operative Society (Age not specified years) Plot No. 16 site A, Rubber park, Valayanchira P O, Pin-683 556 President, Pala marketing Co-operative Society (Age not specified years) Plot No. 16 site A, Rubber park, Valayanchira P O, Pin-683 556

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The execution petition was dismissed due to the absence of the decree holder and no steps taken to produce paper publication.
Evidence:
Decree Holder absent. No steps taken to produce Paper publication. Hence EP dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor, Ernakulam, Kerala
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Co-operative Society

Similar Cases