Case Summary
Suresh filed a petition seeking the division of property as per the preliminary decree for partition dated 26.02.2014.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Final decree for partition
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The court passed a final decree for partition dividing the property into two equal shares for the petitioner and the respondent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The Advocate Commissioner's report indicated an equitable division of the property, leading to a favorable decision for the petitioner.
The Advocate Commissioner's report indicated an equitable division of the property, leading to a favorable decision for the petitioner.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The Advocate Commissioner's report indicated an equitable division of the property, leading to a favorable decision for the petitioner.
The Advocate Commissioner's report indicated an equitable division of the property, leading to a favorable decision for the petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
The Advocate Commissioner's report indicated an equitable division of the property, leading to a favorable decision for the petitioner.
Judgment Evidence:
The court passed a final decree for partition dividing the property into two equal shares for the petitioner and the respondent.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suresh
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o. Makku
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Balan
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o. Makku
Plaintiffs Documents
Preliminary decree for partition dated 26.02.2014
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.E.M.Purushothaman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Final decree for partition
Evidence:
The Advocate Commissioner's report indicated an equitable division of the property, leading to a favorable decision for the petitioner.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Commission report submitted by Sri.V.Sreeraj Advocate Commissioner.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Commission Plan
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Commission plan submitted by Sri.V.Sreeraj Advocate Commissioner.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Suresh vs Balan regarding partition of property
Case Code Year
Case between Suresh vs Balan regarding partition of property