E.P 34/2023 in O.S 396/2015

Case between Surendran vs Sadanandan et al regarding execution of decree

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY

Judge

Smitha Susan Mathew

Order Date

2025-06-20

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Surendran is the decree holder seeking execution against Sadanandan and others. The court has closed the execution petition as satisfied.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Execution Petition

Final Judgment

The court ordered that the execution petition is closed as satisfied.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The execution petition was closed as satisfied, indicating that the decree was executed successfully.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The execution petition was closed as satisfied, indicating that the decree was executed successfully.

Supporting Evidence

The execution petition was closed as satisfied, indicating that the decree was executed successfully.

Judgment Evidence:

Execution Petition is closed as satisfied.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Surendran
Party Age: 70
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sadanandan
Party Age: 71
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Vasundhara
Party Age: 68
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Anu
Party Age: 52
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Binu
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Biju
Party Age: 48
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Benny Jacob
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Mohammed Haris K.S
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification