Case Summary
The case involves plaintiff Surendran K.K and defendants Karthyayani and Sunilkumar K.V. The plaintiff was absent with no representation, and the defendants were represented. Consequently, the suit was dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and the representation of the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to dismissal.
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to dismissal.
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation. No proof affidavit filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Surendran K.K
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Karthyayani
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunilkumar K.V
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sujithkumar T.U
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- N.C.Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.Antony Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Surendran K.K vs Karthyayani, Sunilkumar K.V regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Surendran K.K vs Karthyayani, Sunilkumar K.V regarding dismissal for default