Case Summary
The plaintiff Supran filed a suit against the defendants Rajan and Mani for realization of money. The court dismissed the suit for default due to no instructions from the plaintiff's counsel.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed due to lack of instructions from the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed for default.
The suit was dismissed for default.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed for default.
The suit was dismissed for default.
Supporting Evidence
Counsel for plaintiff submitted that no instructions from plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Supran
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajan
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mani
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dinesh. R. Shenoy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anjali.N
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Joseph George.A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff submitted that no instructions from plaintiff. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Supran vs Rajan et al regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Supran vs Rajan et al regarding realization of money.