Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 479/2025

Case between Superkart Frontline Logistics Pvt. Ltd vs Vapi Kerala Logistics regarding suit rejection

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Superkart Frontline Logistics Pvt. Ltd filed a suit against Vapi Kerala Logistics. The suit was rejected due to non-payment of court fees despite multiple chances given.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the balance court fee after being given numerous chances.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the balance court fee after being given numerous chances.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected due to non-payment of court fees.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit rejected. I.A 4/25 closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Superkart Frontline Logistics Pvt. Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Joyal Joy
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vapi Kerala Logistics
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Fasil Rahman
Relation
Managing Partner
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shyamkumar M.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jismemol James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sarath Kumar T.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vishnuja Vasudevan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vimal Dev D
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Rajasimhan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vykhari K. V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to balance court fee not paid.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Superkart Frontline Logistics Pvt. Ltd vs Vapi Kerala Logistics regarding suit rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Superkart Frontline Logistics Pvt. Ltd vs Vapi Kerala Logistics regarding suit rejection

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won