Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 369/2025

Case between Sunny Kuruvilla Paul et al vs Mani Kuruvilla regarding ad interim injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-10-04
Duration
Case Code No.
369
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a petition for an ad interim injunction filed by Sunny Kuruvilla Paul and Sosamma Kuruvilla against Mani Kuruvilla. The petition was heard, and the court granted the injunction to prevent trespassing into the plaint schedule properties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad interim injunction to the petitioners, prohibiting the respondent from trespassing into the plaint schedule properties until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad interim injunction granted.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad interim injunction to the petitioners, prohibiting the respondent from trespassing into the plaint schedule properties until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that a prima facie case has been made out for the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that prima facie case has been made out and delay in issuing notice would defeat very purpose of the above application.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an ad interim injunction is granted and the respondents is restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule properties until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sunny Kuruvilla Paul
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o Late Pilo Kuruvilla
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sosamma Kuruvilla
Party Age
87
Relation
W/o Pilo Kuruvilla
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mani Kuruvilla
Party Age
45
Relation
Father’s name not known
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Manishkumar K C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Joby Gopal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. G R Panicker
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad interim injunction restraining the respondents from trespassing into the plaint schedule properties until further orders.
Evidence:
Hence an ad interim injunction is granted and the respondents is restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule properties until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Nishana K C regarding decree of suit
Munsiff Court/Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Asset Sapphire Apartment Owners Association vs Amal Shaji et al regarding petition for document production
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aniyamma Joseph et al vs Akhil Joseph et al regarding civil matters.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ajitha Jibi vs Sherin Mathew et al regarding compromise petition.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran et al vs Daniel. K.P. et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won