Case Summary
The petitioner, Dr. Shrikumar, submitted an application regarding IA.No.8/2023. The plaintiffs, Sunitha and Ram Gopal, opposed the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition filed by the defendant, Dr. Shrikumar.
Key Reasoning:
Reasons stated in the affidavit
Reasons stated in the affidavit
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
For the reasons stated in the affidavit.
Judgment Evidence:
The IA. stands allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sunitha
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ram Gopal
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dr. Shrikumar
- Party Age
- 25
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.V.Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.V.A.Jayaraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The interim application stands allowed.
Evidence:
For the reasons stated in the affidavit, the IA. stands allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sunitha vs Dr. Shrikumar regarding IA.No.8/2023
Case Code Year
Case between Sunitha vs Dr. Shrikumar regarding IA.No.8/2023