Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 759/2020

Case between Sunitha Aji @ Sunitha Jose vs Susan Anil et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-17
Duration
approximately-5 years 0 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sunitha Aji @ Sunitha Jose filed a suit against Susan Anil and the Panjos Garden Apartment Owners Association. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed with costs as the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not attend the hearing or present evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed with costs. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 17th day of June, 2025).

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sunitha Aji @ Sunitha Jose (40 years years) Flat No.1, Panjos Garden, Padivattom, Edappally South Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin 682 024

Defendants

Susan Anil (42 years years) Apartment No. 19 A, Pajnos Garden, Padivattom, Edappally South Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin 682 024 Panjos Garden Apartment Owners Association (PGAOA) (Age not specified years) Panjos Garden, Padivattom, Edappally South Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin 682 024

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed with costs.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
Case Filed
Wed, 06/17/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases