Case Summary
Sunilkumar.T.R filed a suit against B.Radha. The court rejected the suit due to non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff did not remit the required balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Plaint rejected u/o7 Rule 11 Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sunilkumar.T.R
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- B.Radha
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.Harilal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to lack of remittance of Balance Court Fee.
Evidence:
No Balance Court Fee remitted. No application seen filed for seeking time to remitting Balance Court Fee. Hence Plaint rejected u/o7 Rule 11 Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sunilkumar.T.R vs B.Radha regarding rejection of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sunilkumar.T.R vs B.Radha regarding rejection of suit