Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP.No. 152/2024

Case between Sunil @ Sanal vs Manju et al regarding review of order in IA 1/2024

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-11-13
Duration
approximately-1 year 6 months
Case Code No.
152
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Sunil @ Sanal, filed a petition to restore IA 1/2024, which had been dismissed for default. The court found that the petitioner had been absent and had not shown valid reasons for the lack of representation in previous hearings.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition to restore IA 1/2024 was dismissed by the court due to the petitioner's absence and lack of justification for previous non-representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Procedure Review
Final Judgment
No
The petition to restore IA 1/2024 was dismissed by the court due to the petitioner's absence and lack of justification for previous non-representation.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the petitioner did not provide valid reasons for non-appearance and failed to represent in earlier hearings.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the petitioner did not provide valid reasons for non-appearance and failed to represent in earlier hearings.
Supporting Evidence
However no reason is shown as to why there was no representation on 12/4/2024 and 18/5/2024.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sunil @ Sanal
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manju
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Biju
Party Age
55
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
E.Gopakumar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mahesh. G.Pillai
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Satheeshkumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Soumya Fernandez
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The petition is dismissed.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Procedure Review
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam District
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Uma Trading Company vs M/s Karthika Trading Company regarding restoration of suit
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between M/s.Asirvad Micro Finance Ltd vs Roy Joseph regarding restoration of suit
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s.A.R. Wood Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s. Venkiteswar Enterprises et al regarding restoration of the suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between John.K.J vs Sister Vinni Vetkkattel et al regarding review of order.
MUNSIFF COURT, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s.A.R. Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.R.J.Enterprises regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won