Case Summary
Sumesh Prameswaran is the plaintiff, while Hemprabha is the defendant. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sumesh Prameswaran
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hemprabha
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arun George D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Paul K Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Hybin Jose PP
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sumesh Prameswaran vs Hemprabha regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Sumesh Prameswaran vs Hemprabha regarding dismissal for default