Case Summary
Sumayya is the plaintiff seeking realization of an amount from the defendant, Khadeeja. Both parties were represented in court, but the suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sumayya
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Khadeeja
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C.I. Edison
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.Surendranath
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.T. Ajayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sumayya vs Khadeeja regarding realization of amount.
Case Code Year
Case between Sumayya vs Khadeeja regarding realization of amount.