EP 138/2025

Case between Sumathi vs Sunitha et al regarding property delivery

Court

Court of the Munsiff, Nadapuram

Judge

Sri. Yadukrishnan. B

Order Date

2025-07-28

Duration

Case Code No.

138

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sumathi is the petitioner seeking property delivery. The respondents are Sunitha, Anitha, and Smitha, who are opposing parties in the case.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Property delivered

Case Type

Execution Petition

Final Judgment

The court has closed the execution petition after recording full satisfaction regarding the property delivery.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was filed under relevant rules of civil procedure for property delivery and satisfaction was recorded.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition was filed under relevant rules of civil procedure for property delivery and satisfaction was recorded.

Supporting Evidence

Decree Holder represented. Property delivered. Full satisfaction recorded.

Judgment Evidence:

This petition coming on this day for hearing before me in the presence of Sri. K. Shajeev, Advocate for Petitioner and of Sri. Ali Siyad, Advocate for respondents and this court passed the following:- ORDER This petition filed under Order XXI Rule 35 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Decree Holder represented. Property delivered. Full satisfaction recorded. EP closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sumathi
Party Age: 60
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sunitha
Party Age: 42
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Anitha
Party Age: 40
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Smith
Party Age: 40
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. K. Shajeev
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. Ali Siyad
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification