Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No.295/2018

Case between Sumathi et al vs Kolleri Mannangottu Premavally regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.ANJALI. P
Order Date
2025-08-23
Duration
approximately-7 years 5 months
Case Closed
Sat, 08/23/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Sumathi and others, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Kolleri Mannangottu Premavally, to prevent obstruction of their access to a property through a pathway. The case involves claims of prescriptive rights over the pathway and disputes about the property boundaries.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit is dismissed with costs to the defendant, as the court found insufficient evidence to support the plaintiffs' claims regarding their prescriptive rights over the pathway.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is dismissed with costs to the defendant, as the court found insufficient evidence to support the plaintiffs' claims regarding their prescriptive rights over the pathway.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not provide consistent evidence to establish their prescriptive rights over the pathway.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs did not provide consistent evidence to establish their prescriptive rights over the pathway.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs did not establish a clear claim of prescriptive rights over the pathway, leading to the dismissal of their suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs to the defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sumathi
Party Age
73
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dhamayanthi
Party Age
67
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sujatha
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.P.Ratheesh
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajesh
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kolleri Mannangottu Premavally
Party Age
61
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Will No.40/1990, Original location Map No.45/2018, Original location certificate No.44/2018, Original Land Tax Receipts
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Anil Viswanath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. N.Manoj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Request for a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendant from obstructing the plaintiffs’ use of the plaint B schedule property.
Evidence:
Therefore, the plaintiff is not entitled to a decree as sought for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Will
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Will No.40/1990 which shows the plaintiffs' rights over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Location Map
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original location Map No.45/2018 which supports the claim of the plaintiffs regarding the layout of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Location Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original location certificate No.44/2018 which further corroborates the plaintiffs' claims.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Land Tax Receipts issued from Ramanattukara Village Office that demonstrate the plaintiffs' financial responsibility for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Title deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Title Deed bearing No.1789/1999 which affirms the ownership of the plaintiffs over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report by Advocate Commissioner which reports on the existence of the way leading to the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch submitted by Advocate Commissioner which supports the findings in the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sumathi et al vs Kolleri Mannangottu Premavally regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sumathi et al vs Kolleri Mannangottu Premavally regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Wed, 03/21/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 08/23/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kolassery Abdurahim vs Kanjirangal Kareem et al regarding property delivery
Rent Control Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Abhinav.K.P et al regarding dismissal of suit.
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Girija et al vs Komalam et al regarding partition
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Fathima Minha.K vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between M Sukumaran vs K. Ahammed et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won