Case Summary
Sultan, the petitioner, sought restoration of a suit which was dismissed due to his non-appearance citing health reasons. The respondent opposed, alleging petitioner's attempt to protract litigation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Conditioned restoration of the suit
Case Type
Civil Suit - Restoration
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the restoration petition with a condition for petitioner to pay costs to the respondent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs. 4,000/- (Four Thousand only) by the petitioner to the respondent on or before 23-1-2018.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sultan
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o. Mulakkaparambil Bava
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arshad
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o. Bavutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Praveen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.A. Ismail
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Suit restoration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of dismissed suit
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs. 4,000/- (Four Thousand only) by the petitioner to the respondent on or before 23-1-2018.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Restoration
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Non-appearance in court
Case Code
Case between Sultan vs Arshad regarding restoration of dismissed suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sultan vs Arshad regarding restoration of dismissed suit