Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 853/2019

Case between Sulochana et al vs Ramesan et al regarding Injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-02-03
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Sulochana, Omana, and others, filed a suit for an injunction. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs were absent during the hearing and did not present any evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs were absent during the hearing and did not present any evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs were absent during the hearing and did not present any evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

As the plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence, suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sulochana
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Omana
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sheena
Party Age
34
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Usha
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramesan
Party Age
52
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.K.Prakash Sathianathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Kallada M.Balachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
As the plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence, suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sulochana et al vs Ramesan et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sulochana et al vs Ramesan et al regarding Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sukanya vs Lalitha et al regarding Injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Ambujakshy vs Sambasivan et al regarding Injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Madhavan Pillai vs Harish.M regarding Injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Sunilkumar vs Radhakrishnan Nair et al regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Vasanthakumari et al vs Divakaran.K et al regarding Injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won