Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P. No. 278/2024 in OS 310/2016

Case between Sulaikha et al vs Beena Aboobacker et al regarding execution petition

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-12-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves decree holders Sulaikha and others seeking enforcement of a judgment against judgment debtors Beena Aboobacker and others. The court ordered the delivery to be effected and the execution petition is closed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the delivery to be effected and closed the execution petition, indicating no further steps were reported.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the delivery to be effected and closed the execution petition, indicating no further steps were reported.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Delivery effected. No further steps reported. EP closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sulaikha
Party Age
64
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ummukulsu
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thahira
Party Age
46
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunjumuhammed
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Jaleel
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Beena Aboobacker
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Riyas
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mumthas
Party Age
31
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shahanas
Party Age
21
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mehanas
Party Age
16
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.A. Abdul Jabbar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mohammed Shaffi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.P. Shanti
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
SARIMOL KAREETHARA
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sulaikha et al vs Beena Aboobacker et al regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between Sulaikha et al vs Beena Aboobacker et al regarding execution petition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Mahendra Kumar. C vs Suresh. V. Varghese regarding E.P No. 199/2023
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Cornation Curries Private Limited vs Happy Varghese et al regarding E.P No. 31/2020
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Shamughapuram Co-operative Bank Limited vs Sumathy Vijayan regarding execution petition
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Manager, DTDC Express Limited et al regarding decree satisfaction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won