Case Summary
Petitioner Suhara filed a petition for restoration of suit which was allowed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Petitioner
Relief Granted
Restoration of suit
Case Type
Civil Miscellaneous Petition - Restoration
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petitioner's petition and restored the suit as per the order.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Cost paid. petition stands allowed. Suit is restored as per order in IA 30/15.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suhara
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fathimma
- Relation
- Respondent
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dinesh Pookayil, P.Sreehari
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Fathimma-R1
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit restoration as per the order in IA 30/15
Evidence:
Cost paid. petition stands allowed. Suit is restored as per order in IA 30/15.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Miscellaneous Petition - Restoration
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.I
Case Code Year
2015